pragmatic-engineer

15 articles

← Back Live Monitor RSS Feed

焦点:前延部署工程师需求再升温

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 本文分析了谷歌、OpenAI 和 Anthropic 等公司日益增长的前延部署工程师 (FDE) 需求,以及这一角色正演变为类似解决方案顾问的趋势。
View content
<p><em>大家好,我是 Gergely,这是《实用工程师通讯》的一期额外免费内容。每期中,我都会从资深工程师和工程领导者的视角,探讨大型科技公司与初创企业的动态。今天,我们将聚焦<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-forward-deployed-engineering?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em><u>上周《焦点》</u></em></a>五个话题中的一个。完整版订阅者已于七天前收到本文。如果您收到了这封转发邮件,可以<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>在此订阅</u></em></a>。</em></p> <p>去年八月,我们报道了<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/forward-deployed-engineers?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">前延部署工程师 (FDE) 需求</a>突然兴起的趋势,而现在有迹象表明需求正在进一步增长。</p> <h3 id="google-fde-recruitment-spike">谷歌:FDE 招聘激增</h3> <p>谷歌正在加倍投入 FDE,并大幅简化招聘流程。谷歌云 CEO 托马斯·库里安<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/thomas-kurian-469b6219_today-we-announced-a-new-ai-focused-organization-share-7460023646418489344-5xWp?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_desktop&amp;rcm=ACoAAAIk0KwBsmE3oBadWSg2ettxmEyKbqZKG34">宣布</a>在 Go-To-Market 团队内成立一个新的 AI 重点组织,并为其招聘大量 FDE。</p> <p>我听说招聘流程已<…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of five topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-forward-deployed-engineering?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em><u>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</u></em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>subscribe here</u></em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Last August, we covered a sudden trend of&#xA0;<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/forward-deployed-engineers?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">high demand</a>&#xA0;for forward deployed engineers (FDEs), and now there are signs demand is increasing more.</p><h3 id="google-fde-recrui…
Read article Original

谷歌云删除澳大利亚养老基金基础设施

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 谷歌云意外删除澳大利亚养老基金所有数据,基金因在第三方有备份而幸免,暴露云服务商不可完全信赖的风险。
View content
<p><em>澳大利亚一个管理1240亿美元资产的养老基金,若非依赖第三方备份,将丢失存储在谷歌云上的所有数据。这是GCP罕见的重大失误——区域复制未能阻止数据删除——谷歌云首席执行官也罕见地发表声明承担责任。</em></p><p><em>以下内容节选自 </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-93?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>《技术脉搏》第93期:OpenAI让谷歌起舞</em></a><em>,最初发布于2024年5月16日。重新发布此文是因为谷歌云在2026年5月20日再次出事:通过 </em><a href="https://x.com/Railway/status/2056873075401007338?s=20&amp;ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>封锁Railway的谷歌云账户</em></a><em>,导致云基础设施提供商Railway离线。本文是一则警示:如果您使用GCP,请准备好B计划,以防GCP删除您的账户和数据,或封锁您的账户。</em></p><p>继谷歌云在云服务提供商中排名遥遥落后之后,最近的一起事件可能进一步巩固其作为三大云服务商中最不可靠的声誉。</p><p>UniSuper是澳大利亚最大的退休储蓄账户之一,为61.5万名公民服务,也被称为“养老基金”。UniSuper管理着1240亿美元的资产,是该国最大的基金之一。</p><p>4月29日,该服务出现故障。会员无法登录在线账户或管理资金,直到两周后的5月15日才恢复。</p><p>原因是谷歌云意外删除了UniSuper的订阅,这也删除了与该订阅相关的所有数据。UniSuper曾在谷歌云的两个区域设置复制以防止单区域故障,但谷歌云也将副本一并删除了!</p><p><strong>UniSuper之所以能避免数据丢失,全赖于在谷歌云之外的另一家服务商处有备份。&#xA0;</strong>令人惊讶的是,UniSuper承认若非谷歌云的失误,他们将丢失谷歌云上的所有数据。UniSuper得以恢复服务的唯一原因是他们在另一家服务商处备份了数据…
Show original
<p><em>A $124B fund in Australia would have lost all data stored with Google Cloud, had they not relied on a third-party backup. A rare blunder from GCP, where regional replication did not stop the deletion &#x2013; and a just as rare statement from Google Cloud&#x2019;s CEO taking the blame.</em></p><p><em>The below is an excerpt from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-93?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>The Pulse #93: OpenAI makes Google dance</em></a><em>, originally published on 16 May, 2024. I am republishing it because on 20 May 2026 Google Cloud has done it again: they took offline cloud infra provider Railway by </em><a href="https://x.com/Railway/status/2056873075401007338?s=20&amp;ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>blocking Railway&apos;s Google Cloud account</em></a><em>. The below is a warning: if you are on GCP, have a plan B, should GCP delete your account and data, or block your account.</em></p><p>Fol…
Read article Original

脉搏:产能短缺是否导致Anthropic对开发者态度转变?

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 分析Anthropic因产能不足可能削弱开发者服务,而竞争对手SpaceX/xAI却出租数据中心助其扩容的矛盾现象。
View content
<p><em>你好,我是Gergely,这是一期Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter的免费特刊。在每一期中,我都从资深工程师和工程领导者的视角,来报道大型科技公司和初创公司。今天,我们将深入探讨<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-did-capacity-shortages?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em><u>上周《脉搏》</u></em></a>五个主题中的一个。完整订阅用户在七天前已经收到了下面这篇文章。如果你收到了这封转发的邮件,可以<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>在此订阅</u></em></a>。</em></p><p>上周,我们报道了Anthropic <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/i/196004322/2-anthropics-speed-run-to-break-peoples-goodwill?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">似乎在快速消耗开发者的善意</a>,其做法包括悄然“削弱”Claude Code、无预警封禁企业账户,以及一项涉及先撤销后恢复Claude Code的奇怪增长实验。本周,一位订阅了20美元/月Pro计划的开发者,在订阅才几天后就失去了Claude Code的使用权:</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/2026/05/image-7.png" class="kg-image" alt loading="lazy" width="1182" heig…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of five topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-did-capacity-shortages?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em><u>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</u></em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>subscribe here</u></em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Last week, we reported on Anthropic <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/i/196004322/2-anthropics-speed-run-to-break-peoples-goodwill?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">seemingly being on a speed run</a> to break devs&#x2019; goodwill by silently &#x201C;ner…
Read article Original

TechPays已被Levels.fyi收购

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 旨在提升欧洲科技行业薪资透明度的平台TechPays被收购,其数据将并入全球平台Levels.fyi。
View content
<p><em>简而言之:</em><a href="https://techpays.com/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>TechPays</u></em></a><em>加入</em><a href="https://www.levels.fyi/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>Levels.fyi</u></em></a><em>:欧洲领先的科技薪资网站将得到应得的关爱与维护。感谢</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rzsombor/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>Zsombor</u></em></a><em>多年来与我共同建设这个项目。</em></p> <p>薪资透明度在科技行业一直是个问题,<em>尤其是在</em>欧洲。有一段时间,我以为伦敦或阿姆斯特丹的高级及以上软件工程师最高薪资大约在10万英镑/10万欧元左右。一旦达到这个水平,就意味着你已经成功,处于市场顶端!<em>真的如此吗?</em></p> <p>因此,当2016年我在Skyscanner担任首席工程师,拿着9.3万英镑的薪水时,我没想到自己还能获得显著更高的报酬。薪资调查一直证实我的收入远高于中位数,处于薪资等级的第90百分位。</p> <p>想象一下我的惊讶:我收到了Uber在阿姆斯特丹的offer,它实际上让我的薪酬翻了一番,达到约22-25万欧元(26-29.5万美元)的水平。到第四年,我的薪酬达到28.3万欧元(33.2万美元):</p> <figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-12-at-17.46.16.png" class="kg-image" alt loading="lazy" width="1210" height="1358" srcset="https…
Show original
<p><em>tl;dr:</em><a href="https://techpays.com/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>TechPays</u></em></a><em> is joining</em><a href="https://www.levels.fyi/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>Levels.fyi</u></em></a><em>: so the leading tech salary site in Europe gets the love and care it deserves. Thanks to</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rzsombor/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>Zsombor</u></em></a><em> for building this project with me for so many years.</em></p><p>Pay transparency has always been an issue in tech, <em>especially</em> in Europe. For a while, I assumed that the most that a senior+ software engineer could make in London or Amsterdam would be in the realm of &#xA3;100K / &#x20AC;100K. Once you reach that level, you&apos;ve made it. You&#x2019;re now at the very top of the market! <em>Or are you?</em></p><p>So when I was making &#xA3;93K in London, working as a principal engineer at Skyscanner in 2016, I was not expecting that I could be comp…
Read article Original

脉搏:AI负载压垮GitHub – 为何其他厂商未受影响?

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 本文探讨了GitHub近期因AI代理负载激增而引发的严重可靠性问题,包括数据完整性事件和多次服务中断,并分析了其与其他厂商在应对能力上的差异。
View content
<p><em>嗨,我是Gergely,这是《实用工程师通讯》的额外免费刊期。在每一期中,我都从资深工程师和工程领导者的视角来探讨大型科技公司和初创企业。今天,我们从</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-github-breaks?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>上周的《脉搏》</em></a><em>议题中选取四个主题之一进行探讨。完整订阅者已于七天前收到了以下文章。如果您被转发了这封邮件,可以</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>点击此处订阅</em></a><em>。</em></p><p>GitHub最近的可靠性表现已远低于可接受水平:上月,第三方测量数据显示其可靠性仅为<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/i/192229275/1-does-github-still-merit-top-git-platform-for-ai-native-development-status?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">一个“9”</a>(即90%)。而本月,根据<a href="https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">第三方跟踪器</a>的数据,可靠性已降至<em>零个“9”</em> – 86%。上周,情况变得更糟:发生了一起堪称丢人的数据完整性事件、更多服务中断,以及GitHub最终给出的部分解释。</p><h3 id="data-integrity-incident">数据完整性事件</h3><p>上周…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of four topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-github-breaks?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em> subscribe here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>GitHub&#x2019;s reliability has been beyond unacceptable recently: last month, third party measurements pinned it at <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/i/192229275/1-does-github-still-merit-top-git-platform-for-ai-native-development-status?ref=blog.pragmatic…
Read article Original

脉搏:Token消耗突破预算——下一步怎么办?

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 本文探讨了企业AI token支出急剧增长的现象,以及不同规模公司采取的应对策略。
View content
<p><em>大家好,我是Gergely,本期是《务实工程师通讯》的免费特刊。每期我都从资深工程师和工程领导者的视角,探讨大型科技公司和初创企业的话题。今天,我们聚焦于</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-ai-token-spending-out-of?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>上周《脉搏》专栏</em></a><em>三个主题中的一个。完整订阅用户七天前已读到下文内容。如果您是通过转发收到此邮件,可以</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>在此订阅</em></a><em>。</em></p><p>上周,我们报道了行业内一种略显扭曲的“token最大化”趋势:开发者运行AI代理的唯一目的是提升个人“token数据”,以期在内部排行榜上排名更高,并避免被视为相比同行更少使用AI工具的卢德分子。</p><p>本周,我与一家大公司和一家种子轮初创公司的软件工程师进行了交流。两人几乎分享了相同的经历:在他们最近的全体会议上,公司领导层对飞速增长的token成本表示担忧。两地的token支出在过去六个月内都增长了约10倍——且没有放缓迹象。</p><p>为深入了解这一趋势,我采访了15家企业的开发者。以下是我在各种规模的工作场所中了解到的情况(名称已匿名)。</p><h2 id="large-companies">大型公司</h2><h4 id="setting-the-default-model-to-a-cheaper-one-10000-person-saas-company-offices-on-all-continents">将默认模型设为更便宜版本:员工超1万人、办公室遍布各大洲的SaaS公司</h4><p>在这家大型SaaS公司,大多数开发者使用内部背景编码工具进行编程。该工具默认使用Claude Sonnet,这是Claude更…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of three topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-ai-token-spending-out-of?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em> subscribe here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Last week, we covered <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">the slightly perverse trend of &#x201C;tokenmaxxing&#x201D;</a> across the industry, w…
Read article Original

脉搏:‘Tokenmaxxing’作为古怪的新趋势

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 文章探讨了科技公司内部出现的“tokenmaxxing”现象,即通过代币使用排行榜激励员工过度消耗AI资源,导致巨大浪费,部分公司已采取措施纠正。
View content
<p><em>大家好,我是Gergely,这是《务实工程师》通讯的一期特别免费版。在每一期中,我都通过资深工程师和工程领导者的视角来探讨大型科技公司和初创公司。今天,我们涵盖</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>上周《脉搏》</em></a><em>中的四个话题之一。完整订阅者已于七天前收到下文。如果您收到了转发的这封邮件,可以</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>在此订阅</em></a><em>。</em></p><p>在Meta内部,一位工程师创建了一个“代币排行榜”,根据代币使用量对员工进行排名。上周,《信息报》<a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/meta-employees-vie-ai-token-legend-status?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">报道称</a>:</p><blockquote>“Meta平台的员工若想炫耀其AI超级用户能力,正在内部排行榜上争夺“会话不朽”——或更高级的“代币传奇”地位。<br><br>该排名由一名Meta员工使用公司数据在其内部网上设立,衡量员工消耗了多少代币——AI模型处理的数据单位。该排行榜被称为“Claudeonomics”(以AI初创公司Anthropic的旗舰产品命名),汇总了超过85,000名Meta员工的AI使用情况,列出了前250名高级用户。<br><br>这种做法是硅谷最新炫耀性消费形式的象征,被称为“tokenmaxxing”,它已将代币使用量转变为生产力的基准,以及衡量谁最具AI原生性的竞争指标。工人们正在最大化他们的提示、…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of four topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em> subscribe here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Inside Meta, an engineer created a &#x201C;token leaderboard&#x201D; that ranks employees by token usage. Last week, The Information <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/meta-employees-vie-ai-token-legend-status?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="no…
Read article Original

脉搏:GitHub 仍然是 AI 原生开发的最佳选择吗?

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 文章讨论了 GitHub 因 AI 智能体带来的巨大负载而面临严重可靠性问题,以及其缺乏战略焦点和领导力,导致可能被更适应 AI 原生开发的初创公司超越。
View content
<p><em>大家好,我是 Gergely,这是 Pragmatic Engineer 新闻通讯的一期额外免费刊。在每一期中,我都从高级工程师和工程领导者的视角来探讨大型科技公司和初创企业。今天,我们讨论的是上周《脉搏》期刊四个主题中的一个。完整订阅用户在八天前就收到了下面这篇文章。如果您收到了这封转发的电子邮件,可以在此处<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>订阅</em></a>。</em></p><p>我们已经习惯了追求四个九(99.99%,意味着每年约 52 分钟停机时间)的高可用性系统,并且认为勉强达到三个九(每年约 9 小时停机时间)是令人尴尬的。然而,在过去的一个月里,GitHub 的可靠性已经跌到了只有一个九!</p><p>以下数据来自第三方 "<a href="https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">缺失的 GitHub 状态页</a>",该页面是在 GitHub 因其糟糕的可用性而停止更新自身状态页后建立的。最近的情况看起来很糟糕:</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/2026/04/image.png" class="kg-image" alt loading="lazy" width="1456" height="399" srcset="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/size/w600/2026/04/image.png 600w, https://…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of four topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-is-github-still-best-for?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below eight days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em> subscribe here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>We&#x2019;re used to highly reliable systems which target four-nines of availability (99.99%, meaning about 52 minutes of downtime per year), and for it to be embarrassing to barely hit three nines (around 9 hours of downtime per year.) And yet, in the past mont…
Read article Original

FDE职位是否越来越不受欢迎?

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 尽管企业对FDE(前线部署工程师)职位的需求激增,但由于其实际工作更偏向销售或咨询而非核心软件工程,导致工程师对此兴趣不大。
View content
<p><em>嗨,我是Gergely,这是《务实工程师通讯》的一期免费增刊。每期我都通过资深工程师和工程领导人的视角来探讨大型科技公司和初创企业。今天,我们探讨上周《脉搏》版块四个主题中的一个。</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-is-the-fde-role-becoming?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>《脉搏》上周版块</em></a><em>的完整内容已提前七天发送给付费订阅者。如果您收到了这封转发邮件,可以</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>在此订阅</em></a><em>。</em></p> <p><a href="https://www.wsj.com/cio-journal/the-hottest-job-in-tech-isnt-very-glamorous-dc29ab3e?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">《华尔街日报》</a>报道了一个有趣的趋势:企业希望招聘FDE(前线部署工程师)岗位,但开发者们对此并不太感兴趣:</p> <blockquote>&#x201C;根据AlphaSense的数据,2025年Indeed上的相关职位发布量比2024年增长了十倍以上。同期,提及该职位的上市公司财报电话会议记录数量也从八份跃升至五十份。<br><br>唯一的问题是?很少有工程师想要这份工作。这份工作历来被认为要求苛刻、不受欢迎,且声望低于以产品为核心的工程岗位。<br><br>&#x201C;每个公司都想要他们,但可能只有10%的市场对这个职位感兴趣,&#x201D; Betts Recruiting的总裁兼首席运营官帕特里克·凯伦伯格(Patrick Kellenberger)说。&#x201C;</blockquo…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of four topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-is-the-fde-role-becoming?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the article below seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em> subscribe here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>An interesting trend highlighted <a href="https://www.wsj.com/cio-journal/the-hottest-job-in-tech-isnt-very-glamorous-dc29ab3e?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">by The Wall Street Journal</a>: companies want to hire for FDE roles…
Read article Original

脉搏:Cloudflare 用 AI 重写 Next.js,重塑商业开源格局

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] Cloudflare 使用 AI 在一周内重写了 Next.js,挑战了商业开源的固有模式。
View content
<p><em>你好,我是 Gergely,本期是《实用工程师》的免费特刊。本期内容是过去一周完整的《脉搏》期刊,付费订阅者在七天前已收到。这篇文章在订阅者中引起了<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-164-nextjs/comments?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">大量讨论</a>,因此我决定更广泛地分享,尤其是因为它引发了关于开源中哪些是可防御的、哪些不是的思考。</em></p> <p><em>如果你是通过转发收到此邮件,可以<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><u>在此订阅</u></a>以在邮箱中接收此类期刊。</em></p> <p>本期《脉搏》聚焦于单一事件,因为它意义重大并可能产生广泛影响。周二,Cloudflare 惊艳了开发者世界,宣布他们用一位开发者在一周内仅花费 1100 美元代币成本就<a href="http://next.js/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">重写</a>了 Next.js:</p> <figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/2026/03/image.png" class="kg-image" alt loading="lazy" width="1186" height="1342" srcset="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/size/w600/2026/03/image.png 600w, https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>Pragmatic Engineer</em></a><em>. This issue is the </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-164-nextjs?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>entire The Pulse issue</em></a><em> from the past week, which paying subscribers received seven days ago. This piece generated </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-164-nextjs/comments?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>quite a few comments across subscribers</em></a><em>, and so I&apos;m sharing it more broadly, especially as it raises questions on what is defensible and what is not with open source.</em></p><p><em>If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>subscribe here</u></em></a…
Read article Original

我用LLM生成的代码在20分钟内替换了一个每年120美元的微型SaaS服务

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 作者用LLM在20分钟内替换了每年120美元的SaaS服务,并讨论了这对SaaS产品和开发者的潜在影响。
View content
<p>我曾对“大型语言模型将杀死SaaS(软件即服务)”的各种论断持怀疑态度。这一想法背后的逻辑是:</p> <ol> <li>SaaS是纯软件产品。用户之所以付费给SaaS提供商,是因为购买这个软件比自己构建更便宜。</li> <li>大型语言模型极大地减少了构建定制软件所需的时间和成本。</li> <li>因此,大多数SaaS提供商将倒闭,因为大多数公司/团队将通过提示大型语言模型来编写他们需要的软件,例如工单管理、会议安排、客户关系管理等。</li> </ol> <p>我之所以持怀疑态度,是因为像人力资源软件Workday这样的SaaS<em>不仅仅</em>是软件。以Workday为例,它需要跟上不同国家的合规要求(例如假日工资),保证准确性(例如符合当地法规的工资单),并且随着时间的推移,软件需要不断更新以适应外部和内部环境的变化。</p> <p><strong>然而,这周我亲身经历了现在用大型语言模型替换SaaS是多么的轻而易举。</strong>在我的网站 <a href="http://pragmaticengineer.com/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">pragmaticengineer.com</a> 上,有一个推荐语板块,展示关于这个出版物的真实的LinkedIn和X帖子。它使用了名为 <a href="https://shoutout.io/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">Shoutout.io</a> 的小服务,每年花费120美元,看起来像这样:</p> <figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/2026/01/image.png" class="kg-image" alt loading="lazy" width="1390" height="1120" srcset="https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/…
Show original
<p>I have been sceptical of the manifold claims that software-as-a-service (SaaS) will be killed by LLMs. The theory behind this idea is:</p><ol><li>SaaS is a pure software product. People who pay SaaS vendors do so because it&#x2019;s cheaper to buy this software than build it.</li><li>LLMs dramatically reduce the time and cost of building custom software.</li><li>Therefore, most SaaS vendors will go out of business because most companies/teams will prompt an LLM to write the software they need, such as for ticketing, meetings, customer relationship management, etc.</li></ol><p>The reason for my scepticism has been that SaaS such as HR software Workday is&#xA0;<em>more</em>&#xA0;than just software. Workday, for example, keeps up with compliance requirements (e.g., for holiday pay in different countries), guarantees correctness (e.g., payslips that comply with local regulations), and over time the software keeps up to date with changes in the external and internal environments.</p><p><…
Read article Original

AI编写大部分代码时的悲伤

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 文章探讨了AI接管大部分代码编写后,程序员对失去个人技艺和成就感的失落与反思。
View content
<p>我正在逐渐接受一个极有可能的现实:未来我发布的大部分<em>我自己的</em>代码将由人工智能编写。它已经写得更快了,而且效果与我亲自敲代码相似。对于我不太熟悉的语言或框架,它甚至比我做得更好。</p><p>这感觉就像某些宝贵的东西被突然夺走了。我花了<em>大量</em>精力才擅长编程,学会如何写出能工作的代码,读懂和理解复杂的代码,以及在代码出错时调试修复。我依然记得大学时第一门“真正”的编程课(学C语言)有多吓人,第一份工作中面对复杂代码库时有多迷茫,也记得自己花了数年时间练习,从其他开发者、书籍和博客中学习,才变得更好。一旦你变得相当出色,你就拥有了通过写出能工作的代码来证明其价值的、容易验证的本领!</p><p>关于构建软件,我最美好的一些记忆都与编写代码有关。那种将几个想法同时梳理并敲打出来的“沉浸其中”状态,那种进入心流、编译代码、运行后看到“<em>是的</em>”,它如预期般工作了的感觉!</p><p>公平地说,这曾经是一种爱恨交加的关系,基于编写复杂代码所需的专注程度。然后还有所有时间预估引发的冲突:当你沉浸其中、致力于解决一个难题时,时间的流逝是不同的。</p><p>现在,这一切看起来都将成为历史。</p><p>我在想,面对编写复杂代码曾经<em>很难</em>这一事实,我是否还会获得同样的满足感?是的,AI很方便,但也伴随着一种失落。</p><p>又或者,随着智能体的出现,“沉浸其中”将转变为思考更高层次的问题,同时指导编写更复杂的代码?</p><hr><p>以上摘自我分析文章《<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/when-ai-writes-almost-all-code-what?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer">当AI编写几乎所有代码时,软件工程会发生什么?</a>》的一个章节。请<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/when-ai-writes-almost-all-code-what?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer">点击此处</a>阅读全文。</p>
Show original
<p>I&#x2019;m coming to terms with the high probability that AI will write most of&#xA0;<em>my</em>&#xA0;code which I ship to prod, going forward. It already does it faster, and with similar results to if I&#x2019;d typed it out. For languages/frameworks I&#x2019;m less familiar with, it does a better job than me.</p><p>It feels like something valuable is being taken away, and suddenly. It took a&#xA0;<em>lot</em>&#xA0;of effort to get good at coding and to learn how to write code that works, to read and understand complex code, and to debug and fix when code doesn&#x2019;t work as it should. I still remember how daunting my first &#x201C;real&#x201D; programming class was at university (learning C), how lost I felt on my first job with a complex codebase, and how it took years of practice, learning from other devs, books, and blogs, to get better at the craft. Once you&#x2019;re pretty good, you have something that&#x2019;s valuable and easy to validate by writing code that works!</p>…
Read article Original

The Pulse:Cloudflare 的最新中断事件再次证明了全局配置变更的危险

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] Cloudflare因实施全局配置变更再次导致大规模服务中断,凸显了此类操作的巨大风险。
View content
<p><em>嗨,我是 Gergely,为您带来《Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter》的特别免费版。每期,我都会从资深工程师和工程领导者的视角,剖析大型科技公司和初创企业。今天,我们将讨论上周 <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-156?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em><u>The Pulse</u></em></a> 刊物中四个话题之一。完整版订阅用户早在七天前就收到了下文。如果您是通过邮件转发看到这篇文章,可以</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>在此订阅</u></em></a><em>。</em></p> <p>距离 <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-154?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Cloudflare 上次遭遇重大中断并导致半数互联网瘫痪</a>仅两周,同样的事情再次发生。上周五,12月5日,数千个网站再次宕机或部分中断,Cloudflare 全球性服务中断持续了25分钟。</p> <p>和上次一样,Cloudflare 迅速在同一天发布了 <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/5-december-2025-outage/?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">完整的事后分析报告</a>。据估计,Cloudflare 28%的 HTTP 流量受到影响。这次最新中断的原因是 Cloudflare 进行了一次看似无害,却是<em>全局性</em>的配置变更,导致全球范围内 Cloudflare 的大量服务中断,直到变更被回滚。事件经过如下:</p> <ul> <li>Cloudflare …
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of four topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-156?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em><u>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</u></em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the below article seven days ago. If you&#x2019;ve been forwarded this email, you can</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em> <u>subscribe here</u></em></a><em>.</em></p><p>A mere two weeks after <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-154?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Cloudflare suffered a major outage</a> and took down half the internet, the same thing has happened again. Last Friday, 5th December, thousands of sites went down or …
Read article Original

The Pulse:科技巨头是否会全面推行五天重返办公室政策?

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] Meta旗下Instagram部门要求员工每周五天返回办公室工作,这可能预示着科技行业远程办公政策的转变。
View content
<p><em>嗨,我是Gergely,本期为Pragmatic Engineer通讯的额外免费期刊。每一期,我都会从资深工程师和工程领导者的视角,探讨大型科技公司与初创企业的话题。今天,我们将聚焦上周《The Pulse》期刊中四个主题中的一个。完整订阅者已于七天前收到下文。如需每周收到此类文章,</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>请在此订阅</em></a><em>。</em></p><hr><p>一年前,亚马逊成为首家要求员工每周五天全部返回办公室工作的科技巨头。当时,我<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/i/149104874/what-does-amazons-day-rto-mean-for-tech?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">分析了</a>这一变化的原因,以及其他工作场所是否会效仿,放弃普遍实行的每周2-3天到岗的混合办公政策。</p><p>如今,Meta旗下Instagram部门的员工,继本周社交媒体平台宣布后,成为了最新一批被要求全面返回办公室的员工。</p><h3 id="instagram%E2%80%99s-5-day-return-to-office">Instagram的5天重返办公室政策</h3><p>据Substack的同行Alex Heath报道,Instagram员工<a href="https://sources.news/p/instagrams-return-to-office-mandate?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">在周一收到了这封出乎意料的邮件</a>,他获取了该邮件的副本。这封邮件由Instagram首席执行官Adam Mosseri内部发出,内容如下:</p><blockquote>“<strong>1. 返回办公室:</strong>我认为,当我们亲自在一起时,更有创造力和协作精神。(...)<br><br><strong>2. 减少会议:</stron…
Show original
<p><em>Hi, this is Gergely with a bonus, free issue of the Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter. In every issue, I cover Big Tech and startups through the lens of senior engineers and engineering leaders. Today, we cover one out of four topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-155?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>last week&#x2019;s The Pulse</em></a><em> issue. Full subscribers received the below article seven days ago. To get articles like this in your inbox, every week, </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"><em>subscribe here</em></a><em>.</em></p><hr><p>A year ago, Amazon became the first tech giant to bring staff back into the office for the full five days per week. Back then, I&#xA0;<a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/i/149104874/what-does-amazons-day-rto-mean-for-tech?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com">analyzed</…
Read article Original

Downdetector 与无上游依赖的真实代价

Translated AI Summary eng
[AI 摘要] 本文分析了宕机监控服务 Downdetector 因采用 Cloudflare 而暴露关键依赖的案例,并探讨了移除此类上游依赖在实际业务中可能带来的高昂成本与权衡。
View content
<p><em>以下是来自 </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-154?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>The Pulse #154。</em></a><em> 的五个话题之一。完整订阅用户已于两周前收到下文。如需每周在收件箱中收到此类文章,</em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em><u>请在此订阅</u></em></a><em>。</em></p><p><em>许多订阅用户将《Pragmatic Engineer 通讯》计入其学习与发展预算。如果您有此类预算,</em><a href="https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/request-to-expense-the-pragmatic-engineer-newsletter/"><em><u>可以考虑向您的经理发送此邮件</u></em></a><em>。</em></p><hr><p>关于 <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-154?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer">2025年11月 Cloudflare 服务中断事件</a>,一个有趣的情况是,实时宕机和监控服务 Downdetector 自身也发生了宕机,从而暴露了其对 Cloudflare 的关键依赖。乍看之下,这似乎有些矛盾;毕竟 Downdetector 是一个监控服务正常运行时间的服务,那么如果它要承担像 Cloudflare 这样的关键依赖,并可能因此导致此类事件发生,它为什么要这么做呢?</p><p><strong>Downdetector 是采用多区域、多云架构构建的,</strong>&#xA0;这一点我通过与 Downdetector 背后公司 Ookla 的工程高级总监 <a href="https://x.com/damndhruv?r…
Show original
<p><em>The below is one out of five topics from </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-154?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer"><em>The Pulse #154.</em></a><em> Full subscribers received the below article two weeks ago. To get articles like this in your inbox, every week, </em><a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/about?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com"><em><u>subscribe here</u></em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Many subscribers expense The Pragmatic Engineer Newsletter to their learning and development budget. If you have such a budget, here&#x2019;s</em><a href="https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/request-to-expense-the-pragmatic-engineer-newsletter/"><em><u> an email you could send to your manager</u></em></a><em>.</em></p><hr><p>One amusing detail of the <a href="https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-154?ref=blog.pragmaticengineer.com" rel="noreferrer">November 2025 Cloudflare outage</a> is that the realtime outage and moni…
Read article Original